Soja: ROSARIO
$340.000 2.87%
Maíz: ROSARIO
$210.000 0.48%
Trigo: ROSARIO
$235.000 0.00%
By Agroempresario.com
The regulatory landscape for cultivated meat is evolving rapidly across the globe, with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) setting the benchmark in novel foods approvals. However, the process has posed challenges, particularly for startups aiming to navigate complex regulations. The lack of structured guidance and the difficulty of engaging with regulators before submitting applications has been a consistent issue. In response to this, the UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) has introduced a “more tailored approach” through its cultivated meat sandbox program. This initiative helps companies understand what is required from them before formally submitting their regulatory dossiers, creating a more transparent and efficient pathway.
Startups like Hoxton Farms (UK), BlueNalu (USA), Mosa Meat (The Netherlands), Gourmey (France), Roslin Technologies (UK), Uncommon Bio (UK), Vital Meat (France), and Vow (Australia) have been selected to participate in the sandbox program. These companies are at the forefront of the cultivated meat revolution, and they now have the opportunity to engage in one-on-one consultations with the FSA. Robert Jones, VP of global public affairs at Mosa Meat, explained that the participants will also benefit from monthly workshops where insights from both the group sessions and private consultations will be shared. These insights will be anonymized and integrated into updated guidance, helping to refine the regulatory process.
Following Brexit, the FSA retained the EU’s novel foods framework but began considering ways to optimize it for the UK market. As Jones noted during a discussion at the Future Food-Tech summit in San Francisco, while EFSA has updated its guidance, there remains a need for more clarity, particularly as it relates to cultivated meat. The ideal regulatory process, according to startups, would allow companies to ask specific questions about their products and processes before submitting a formal dossier. This ensures that engaging with a regulator on one aspect of the technology does not delay the entire application process.
For Mosa Meat, the UK approval process is something they have purposely waited to engage with. They want to ensure they have the opportunity for intensive engagement with the FSA to submit a "bulletproof dossier." Although Mosa Meat has already filed regulatory submissions in Singapore, Switzerland, and the EU, their UK application is set to be submitted soon. For startups like Mosa Meat, this sandbox experience is invaluable, providing them the confidence to submit their dossiers with greater clarity and less uncertainty.
A common concern among companies participating in such programs is the potential risk of sharing sensitive information, especially when multiple competitors are involved. Jones addressed this concern, explaining that each company will decide the level of sensitivity regarding the information shared during workshops. As Mosa Meat originated from a government grant and a research project at the University of Maastricht, the company has tended to be more open, having published several peer-reviewed papers. The company has also found that much of the growth media components in cellular agriculture are common across companies, which opens up opportunities for sharing insights on standardization, safety protocols, and production processes.
In addition, the sandbox program is helping to create a collaborative environment where the regulatory process can be refined. This is particularly important as many components used in the production of cultivated meat, such as growth media and safety protocols, require standardization. Such collaborative efforts help ensure that the industry as a whole is moving toward creating safe and reliable products, which is key for gaining regulatory approval.
Despite the progress made with the sandbox, Hoxton Farms' co-founder and CEO, Max Jamilly, pointed out the ongoing challenges with resourcing and timelines at the FSA. While the UK has made strides by allocating £1.6 million ($2.1 million) in funding for the sandbox, the agency continues to manage a high volume of novel food applications across various categories. This has placed a strain on the FSA’s capacity, slowing down the approval process.
Jamilly believes that further streamlining and additional funding will be essential for the FSA to keep up with the rapid pace of innovation in the cultivated meat sector. In addition, he stressed the importance of creating a regulatory framework that allows public tastings of cultivated meat products, similar to what is already permitted in markets like Singapore and the Netherlands. Public tastings enable companies to gather consumer feedback before products are approved for commercial sale, which helps familiarize the public with cultivated meat while promoting transparency in the regulatory process.
Global alignment between regulatory bodies is also a significant consideration for cultivated meat companies. Jamilly noted that Hoxton Farms is likely to receive regulatory approval in markets like Singapore before the UK. However, once the company begins producing cultivated fat in the UK, it will need to export its products. This creates challenges around facility inspections and international coordination. The UK’s Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) will need to work with regulatory agencies like the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) to ensure UK production sites meet export standards.
This process of international alignment is vital for ensuring that products can be exported efficiently, without unnecessary delays or regulatory hurdles. Engaging early with international regulators is crucial to avoid potential bottlenecks that could lead companies to relocate their production outside of the UK.
Dr. Lauran Madden, CTO of US-based BlueNalu, which specializes in cell-cultivated seafood, expressed appreciation for the FSA’s more tailored approach to regulating cultivated meat. She noted that while the FSA’s timeline of reviewing two dossiers within the next two years might seem modest, it is in line with the timelines set by other regulatory bodies. For example, in the US, only three no-questions letters have been issued in recent years, with dossiers taking between 1 and 3 years to review. Similarly, EFSA’s reviews in the EU often take 2.5 to 5 years, with some applications requiring a "stop the clock" event during the review process.
Madden highlighted that the FSA’s more hands-on approach provides a greater level of transparency, helping companies understand exactly what is needed for a successful application. This contrasts with the EU system, which, despite its rigorous standards, can still be challenging to navigate due to the lack of direct consultation. Madden also pointed out that similar regulatory frameworks are being developed in other countries such as Singapore, Australia, and Japan, all of which are working toward creating clear and consistent pathways for the cultivated meat sector.
The approach being taken by the FSA is being seen as a potential model for other nations. Countries like Singapore, Australia, and Japan are already developing similar frameworks for regulating cultivated meat. These frameworks focus on science-driven, transparent processes that engage directly with companies to establish clear guidelines. By creating consistent regulatory pathways, these nations can facilitate the global growth of the cultivated meat industry while ensuring that safety and quality standards are met.
As the cultivated meat sector continues to evolve, it is essential for regulators to collaborate internationally, share best practices, and ensure that their regulatory frameworks are adaptable to the fast-paced innovations in this field. The UK’s sandbox program represents a significant step forward in achieving these goals, offering a glimpse into how regulatory bodies can work more closely with companies to support innovation while maintaining public trust in new food technologies.
In conclusion, the UK’s cultivated meat regulatory sandbox offers a promising path for startups in the sector. With its tailored approach, focus on transparency, and collaboration with companies, the FSA is paving the way for the safe and efficient approval of cultivated meat products. While challenges remain, particularly around resourcing and international alignment, the progress made so far highlights the potential for a more streamlined, efficient, and science-driven regulatory process in the cultivated meat industry.
