Ideas & Opiniones / Global Agro

EU Novel Food Delays: Why Bureaucracy Is Choking Off Food Innovation

Novel food approvals in the EU take over 2.5 years on average, risking startup survival and innovation pace

EU Novel Food Delays: Why Bureaucracy Is Choking Off Food Innovation
martes 15 de julio de 2025

By Agroempresario.com

Europe positions itself as a leader in sustainable food innovation, yet new data reveals a significant bottleneck: the EU’s novel food authorization process takes on average 2.5 years, sometimes up to six years, just to obtain an EFSA opinion. For startups and SMEs in foodtech, this bureaucratic delay can be a fatal barrier.

A detailed review of 292 EFSA novel food applications between 2018 and 2024 highlights that despite an 87% approval rate, the drawn-out process drains startup resources, delays market entry, and traps promising sustainable ingredients in regulatory limbo.

The lengthy timeline and administrative hurdles

The data published in npj Science of Food breaks down the delays as follows:

  • European Commission (EC) verification: 114 ± 181 days
     
  • EFSA suitability check: 185 ± 122 days
     
  • EFSA evaluation: 629 ± 338 days
     
  • Time to publication: 48 ± 16 days
     

The total averages around 937 days—approximately 2.56 years.

Adding to the delay, applicants face an average of 2.7 Additional Data Requests (ADRs), each taking 130 days to answer, accounting for almost half of EFSA’s evaluation period.

When high approval rates aren’t enough

An 87% approval rate might suggest an efficient system, but the reality is more complex. The bureaucratic burden leads many startups to exhaust funding before market entry. Several administrative factors exacerbate delays:

  • The EU Transparency Regulation (2019/1381) mandates study notifications; 30 applications were rejected solely for missing this step, causing an average 10.6-month delay.
     
  • The European Commission forwards all novel food applications to EFSA, even when scientific opinions aren’t always necessary under Article 11 of the regulation.
     
  • There are no fixed deadlines for responding to ADRs, leading to drawn-out back-and-forth that saps momentum.
     

Real-world consequences for innovation and startups

These delays have serious impacts. Startups working on sustainable ingredients such as coffee by-products, fungi, and novel plant proteins find themselves stalled. Funding cycles rarely stretch across multi-year regulatory waits, forcing many promising innovations to be shelved or abandoned.

Compared to more agile regulators like the US FDA or the Singapore Food Agency—who use phased or conditional approvals—the EU lags behind, risking losing its competitive edge in food innovation.

A notable example is coffee cherry pulp, a nutrient-rich by-product approved in multiple global markets but still largely inaccessible in the EU due to regulatory bottlenecks.

Practical reforms to accelerate approvals

Stephen O’Rourke, a regulatory consultant with extensive foodtech expertise, suggests actionable reforms that maintain EFSA’s high safety standards while speeding up novel food authorizations:

  • Use Article 11 discretion: Allow the EC to bypass EFSA opinion when safety is already established (e.g., for previously assessed substances or minor changes).
     
  • Create fast-track channels: Simplify and expedite reviews for pre-evaluated or low-risk ingredients.
     
  • Support better dossiers upfront: Provide pre-submission coaching and clearer guidance to reduce the frequency and duration of ADR cycles.
     
  • Impose structured ADR timelines: Set fixed response windows and coordinated Q&A sessions to cut months off evaluations.
     

A critical juncture for EU food innovation

Europe’s Farm to Fork strategy, the Green Deal, and Net Zero goals depend heavily on unlocking sustainable food innovations. However, the current novel food process risks killing innovation momentum before it starts.

Founders navigating this complex system benefit greatly from regulatory partners who understand both the science and bureaucracy—potentially turning a multi-year delay into timely market access.

EFSA’s rigorous safety work is essential, but science and safety must not be hostage to excessive bureaucracy. Without reform, the EU risks losing the next generation of food innovation to faster-moving global markets.



Invertí en periodismo de calidad

En Agroempresario trabajamos para acercarte contenidos que agregan valor.
Quiero suscribirme

Todas las Categorías

¡Envianos tus Contenidos!

Difundí tus Ideas, Conocimientos, Experiencias, Opiniones y Proyectos.


¡Juntos el Campo es más fuerte!





















¡Juntos por la eliminación
de las Retenciones!

Te invitamos a contarle a todos los argentinos por qué es bueno eliminar las Retenciones.

¡Sumá tu Stand!

Publicá tu marca en la plataforma líder del agro y aumentá tus ventas hoy.

Recibí los mejores contenidos

Suscribite a nuestro Newsletter y sigamos agregando valor.

Agroempresrio

¡Contenidos que agregan valor!